Question: Critical Thinking Assignment.20 x + ownloads/Critical%20Thinking%20Assignment.2019.pdf Problem: Elizabeth Howards and Chris Browning are facing an important decision when it comes to selecting between two mutually

 Critical Thinking Assignment.20 x + ownloads/Critical%20Thinking%20Assignment.2019.pdf Problem: Elizabeth Howards and Chris

Browning are facing an important decision when it comes to selecting between

two mutually exclusive projects. After having discussed different financial scenarios, the two

engineers finalized their cash flow projections and wanted to move to the

Critical Thinking Assignment.20 x + ownloads/Critical%20Thinking%20Assignment.2019.pdf Problem: Elizabeth Howards and Chris Browning are facing an important decision when it comes to selecting between two mutually exclusive projects. After having discussed different financial scenarios, the two engineers finalized their cash flow projections and wanted to move to the next stage decide which of two possible mutually exclusive projects they should undertake. Page I of 4 When analyzing the projects, they estimated that they would need to spend about $1,250,000 on plant, equipment and supplies. As for future cash flows, they felt that the right strategy at least for the first year would be to sell their product at dirt-cheap prices to induce customer nce. Then, once the product had established a name for itself, the price could be raised. By the end of the fifth year, their product could be sold to a larger chip manufacturer for a decent sum. Accordingly, Elizabeth and Chris estimated the cash flows for this project (call it Project A) as follows: Project A Expected Cash flows (S) 1,250,000) 25,000 100,000 700,000 Year Thinking Assignment.201 x ads/Critical%20Thinking%20Assignment,2019 pdf as follows: Project A Expected Cash flows (S) (1,250,000) 25,000 Year 700,000 1,000,000 An alternative to pursuing this project would be to immediately sell the patent for their innovative chip design to one of the established chip makers. They estimated that they would receive around $200,000 for this. It would probably not be reasonable to expect much more as neither their product nor their innovative approach had a track record. In addition, Elizabeth and Chris were confident that they could persuade at least some of the chip makers to outsource this function to them. By exclusively specializing in this task, their little company would be able to slash costs by more than half, and thus allow the chip manufacturers to go in for 100% quality check for roughly the same cost as what they were incurring for a partial quality check today. The life of this project too (call it project B) is expected to be only about five years. The initial investment for this project is estimated at $ 1,100,000. After considering the sale of their patent, the net investment would be $950,000. As for the future, the two engineers were pretty sure that there would be sizable profits in the first couple of years. But thereafter, the zircon content problem would slowly start to disappear with advancing technology in the wafer industry. Keeping all this in mind, they estimate the cash flows for this project as follows: Project B Expected Cash flows (S) Year F4 F6 F7 F8 F10 F1l F12 inking Assignment 201 X+ ds/Critical%20Thinking%20Assignment. 2019.pdf Project B Expected Cash flows (S) ($950,000) 550,000 Year 650,000 400,000 150,000 Page 2 of 4 Elizabeth and Chris now need to make their decision. For purposes of analysis, they plan to use a required rate of return of 16% for both projects. Ideally, they would prefer that the project they choose have a payback period of less than 3.5 years and a discounted payback period of less than 4 years. One of the concerns that Elizabeth and Chris have is regarding the reliability of their cash flow estimates. All the analysis in the table above is based on "expected" cash flows. However, they are both aware that actual future cash flows may be higher or lower. Assignment: Page 2 of Elizabeth and Chris now need to make their decision. For purposes of analysis, they plan to use a required rate of return of 16% for both projects. Ideally, they would prefer that the project they choose have a payback period of less than 3.5 years and a discounted payback period of less than 4 years. One of the concerns that Elizabeth and Chris have is regarding the reliability of their cash flow estimates. All the analysis in the table above is based on "expected" cash flows. However, they are both aware that actual future cash flows may be higher or lower. Assignment Suppose that Elizabeth and Chris hired you as a consultant to help them make the decision. 1. Please calculate the payback period (in years), the discounted payback period (in years). the net present value (NPV), the internal rate of return (IRR) and the modified internal rate of return (MIRR) for each project. Make sure you show the steps you follow (i.e. formula, calculator key strokes, excel formula) and the results for each model. (50 points) 2. Draft an official memo to the engineers with your analysis and recommendations. (50 27 F5 F6 F8 F9 F1O FT 4 6 8 0

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Students Have Also Explored These Related Finance Questions!