Critically (and using case law where applicable), discuss the following statement:

'Once it is understood that nuisances 'productive of sensible personal discomfort' do not constitute a separate tort of causing discomfort to people but are merely part of a single tort of causing injury to land, the rule that the plaintiff must have an interest in the land falls into place as logical and, indeed, inevitable.'Lord Hoffman in Hunter v Canary Wharf Ltd [1997] AC 655 at 707.