CRITIQUE the following case study: A high$-$profile case of data misuse occurred back in $2014$ when an employee at one of the world$$s

fastest$-$growing companies, Uber, violated the company$$s policy by using its $$God View$$ tool to track

a journalist who was late for an interview with an Uber exec. $($If you are unfamiliar, $$God View$$

allowed the company$$s staff to track both Uber vehicles and customers.$)$ The tool was unavailable to

drivers but was $($at the time$)$ apparently $$widely available$$ at a corporate level. Tracking the journalist

flies in the face of Uber$$s privacy policy at the time, which stated that employees are prohibited from

looking at customer rider histories except for $$legitimate business purposes.$$