D Question 9 1 pts Sheila Blige decides she does not want a new dress she had recently purchased from Manny Kinn's Haberdashery. She had worn the dress twice, but decided she just did not like the dress. The dress fit her fine, and there was nothing wrong with it. She returns the undamaged dress to Manny Kinn's Haberdashery. Manny Kinn's Haberdashery, in conformance with its policy, gives Sheila Blige a full refund of her money. Which of these statements is correct? (Choose all of the correct answers.) Since Manny Kinn's Haberdasher's policy allows Sheila Blige to return the dress, and because Sheila Blige wants the money back, stakeholder analysis could conclude her behavior is ethical O After evaluating all the facts and circumstances, Sheila Blige could be considered to be ethical under situational ethics O Under natural law, Sheila Blige's conduct is ethical because she did not do anything in violation of Manny Kinn's Haberdashery's policies O Under positive law, Sheila Blige's conduct is ethical because Manny Kinn's Haberdasher's policy of giving a full refund applies Since Sheila Blige could argue her behavior was fair and legal--mainly because Manny Kinn's Haberdashery's policies allowed her to return the dress even though she had worn it--and her action does not make her feel bad, the Blanchard/Pearle test could conclude her behavior was ethical