d. Would you have decided this case differently if Matthew had been 15? What if he had been 35? What arguments could you make for each situation? How would they differ? Problem 21-4, page 265 a. Make a list of five items that are or can be dangerous to use. b. For each item, decide whether the government should ban it, regulate it (for example, require warnings), or take no action at all. why you treated each item as you did. Consider in your explanation both the danger(s) and the benefit(s) of each item. Problem 21-5, page 223 a. If Gabriella becomes sick after having the vaccination, should the drug company that manufactures the vaccine be held strictly liable for Gabriella's injury? b. Is the risk of getting sick from the vaccine unreasonable? Do the benefits outweigh the dangers? c. What arguments can the drug company make to defend itself? Identify the public policy issues that the company might use in its defense. d. Should Gabriella be abletosue the govenment for forcing her to take a drug she doesn't want to take? Why or why not? Problem 21-6, page 266 a. If you were a lawmaker, would you vote for a law that allowed gun makers to be held liable for damages, or would you support a law that protected gun makers from tort suits? Explain your answer and your reasoning b. Are gun manufacturers able to be sued in your state? Is this a current legislative issue where you live? Should it be