DATA SET $1$

$"$c$100$a$7$cd$-$e$3$a$2-4901-$a$3$e$0-12336$f$769$c$7$b$"$: $\{$

"Type": "Comparison",

"Section id$"$: "Adverse Events",

"Primary id$"$: $"$NCT$00258960",$

"Secondary id$"$: $"$NCT$00121992",$

"Statement": "the secondary trial reported $1$ single case of Conjunctivitis, whereas the primary trial

reported ${16}^{\text{'}\text{'}},$

"Label": "Contradiction"

$\},$

DATASET $2$

$"606$e$7$dc$4-93$a$9-4078-$b$016-0$ebf$7$afa$0$a$9$a$"$: $\{$

"Type": "Single",

"Section id$"$: "Adverse Events",

"Primary id$"$: $"$NCT$00606931",$

"Statement": "the primary clinical trial includes a dedicated section for the documentation of

adverse events."

$\},$

DATASET $3$

$"1$efb$5188-$f$958-4$bba$-881$a$-26278$a$6$e$1796"$: $\{$

"Type": "Comparison",

"Section$\_$id$"$: "Adverse Events",

"Primary$\_$id$"$: $"$NCT$02273973",$

"Secondary$\_$id$"$: $"$NCT$00281697",$

"Statement": "enterocolitis was not a common condition among the participants of both the primary and secondary clinical trials"

$\},$

$1.$ Convert the statements $($premise$)$ into Description Logic by hand using your own understanding.

$2.$ Convert the query $($hypothesis$)$ from the report into Description Logic by hand using your own understanding.

$3.$ Then apply reasoning logic $($tableuax logic$)$ to workout if the hypotehsis entails from the premise.

$4.$ Compare the result of formal logic implications with your understanding or with the label provided with the query and give your comments if your result is correct or not. If the result is not correct, then give reasons that why it is not correct.