Deciphering the Complex Contractual Dispute we have two parties involved$-$Defendant A which is a Technology consulting services and the second one is Defendant B which is a Government Contractor. Because we know the final outcome in that Defendant A won the final appeal court case, of the appellate court ruled in their favor. The court held that payment by Company A was indeed contingent upon both the acceptance of services and the receipt of payment from the client, in accordance with the contract's clear condition precedent. As a result, Company A was relieved of its obligation to pay the Contractor for the services provided. What we need to do is Summarize the case by identifying the parties to the contract, the portion of the contract that was in dispute, and the results of the case. Do you agree with the original court$$s decision or the appellate court$$s decision? Why or why not?