Describe one real or hypothetical $($which is not too far$-$fetched$)$ example of how an outside interest might challenge a federal agency$$s implementation of NEPA as $$arbitrary or capricious$$ as it relates to one of the following issues: scale of analysis, scope of analysis, connected actions, adequate consideration of environmental effects, reasonable range of alternatives, the use of a categorical exclusion, cumulative effects, tiering, public participation, or supplementation of NEPA analysis