Differences between contracts formed under the common law and those formed under the Uniform Commercial Code. Bentley is a manager at a high-end printing company called Graphic Communications Inc. ( GCl).GCl designs and produces posters and other materials for advertising purposes for a variety of clients, including a local symphony orchestra and Main Street University. After GCI received a large order from the university that required a special press, Bentley was assigned to locate a suitable press, negotiate the purchase terms, and arrange for delivery no later than July 1. Bentley negotiated a price with Armstrong Press Manufacturing for the Armstrong model 2000 printing press. The press was sufficiently large as to require that it be delivered in three separate pieces and then assembled on-site. One factor in choosing Armstrong as a vendor was that GCl had used Armstrong before for purchases of smaller presses and had been satisfied with its products and services. In those previous transactions, GCI had used its own standard preprinted purchase order, and no disputes developed. Once the parties agreed on price. Bentley issued a preprinted purchase order. The purchase order was one page long and had very few terms. It contained only the price, description of the press, the date of the purchase order, a provision that agreed that all three pieces of the press would be delivered and operational by July 1, and Bentley's signature. After Armstrong received the purchase order. Armstrong's manager handwrote this phrase in the delivery section of the purchase order: "Acknowledged as a destination contract. To be delivered and assembled in three installments to GCl over the month of May. Armstrong's manager then signed the purchase order, faxed the purchase order back to Bentley, and began to process the order. Armstrong shipped the first part of the press using a common carrier delivery service. Before delivery, the truck was involved in an accident, and the first part of the press was destroyed. 2a. Suppose for this question only that there... Multiple Cholce Common law for the purchase and Article 2 of the Uniform Commerclal Code for the assembly. Common law for both the purchase and the assembly. Article 2A of the Uniform Commercial Code for both the purchase and the assembly. Common law for the assembly and Article 2 of the Unlform Commerclal Code for the purchase. Common law for the assembly and Article 2A of the Uniform Commerclal Code for the purchase. 2b. The printing presses themselves are... The printing presses themselves are goods because they are Multiple Choice Intellectual property and moveable. Intellectual property and tangible. Tangible and immovable. Intangible and moveable. Tangible and movable. a sale of goods and a service? Multiple Choice An unenforceable contract. A mixed contract. A voidable contract. A conglomerate contract. A suspended contract. Multiple Choice The reasonable construction test. The underpinning test. The reasonable assumption test. The vision of the courts test. The predominant purpose test. 2e. Because of regularly engaging In sales of... Because of regularly engaging in sales of printing presses, the Uniform Commercial Code defines Arrmstong as which of the following? Multiple Choice A unit seller. A primary. A merchant. A wholesaler. A UCC-1 seller