Different in focus is the BYOD $($Bring Your Own Device$)$ movement in which employees use their prersonal devices at work. Employees reportedly prefer their own choices of tech devices and also to have the freedom of use. IT departments don't necessarily like the security challenges, but government and public companies have moved toward the trend at an increasing pace. One report stated that as many as $75\%$ of companies have modified policies to allow for BYOD.

When companies decide whether or how to monitor employee cyber use, researchers offer important considerations.

Some say if you take away private internet use, be prepared for employees to perceive they lost a benefit. Part of the person's commitment to the job may be the ability to flexibly take care of some personal business. Good employees take time to relax and get personal tasks completed. "Work$-$life flexibility" acknowledges the blending of work and personal time, and research shows that minor cyberloafing can boost productivity and positively impact emotions.

Others say that minor personal internet use may be a panacea. If you eliminate the ability to cyberloaf, you may just see another negative behavior take its place, such as socializing, absences$,$ tardiness, or daydreaming.

Those who equate cyberloafing with stealing fear that minor cyberloafing will escalate and become a major problem. Instead of stealing office supplies, employees are stealing work time. In fact, one study suggested that malicious personality traits correlated with a high degree of cyberloafing. The authors suggested that employees may perceive they can "get away" with stealing.

Allowing private Internet use through a BYOD policy is a bad idea according to which withdrawal model$($s$)?$