Question: Discharged for Off Duty Behavior - Assignment #3 The following caseitlustrates the off duur privacy claim or an employee and management's right to uphold the

Discharged for Off Duty Behavior - Assignment #3

Discharged for Off Duty Behavior - Assignment #3

Discharged for Off Duty Behavior - Assignment #3 The following caseitlustrates the off duur privacy claim or an employee and management's right to uphold the reputation or the company Assignment instructions Read the following case and answer the questions that follow. Reference information from your text. Although not required, you may use outside resources in research Be sure to cite all sources Formal citations are not required. For this book, include the parte number at the end of the information. For outside sources, include the website or author/book information, such as swww.roslal and Cons(this source can be used). There is no word or page requirement, however, you MUST thoroughly answer the question with detail and supporting evidence Additionally, documents should be submitted in a word document with the following criteria: Times New Roman font, Sime 12, double spaced (make sure to check this as it is not default on word), and 1 inch margins Your name class, assignment name and date should be included on the top len corner of the document Case Review Before his termination on Monday, May 6, 2014, John Hilliard worked as a senior sales representative for Advanced Educational Materials (ARM), a provider of high quality educational books and supplies to junior and senior high schools. During his 12 years of employment John was recognized as an outstanding employee with close working relationships with the schools he served. His sales record was excellent. John's discharge resulted from what AEM claimed was a serious breach of its code of conduct for employees, On Saturday, May 4, 2014, due to a chance meeting between John and his manager. Jean Ellison, John was observed leaving an adult video store carrying what his manager described as pornographic magazines and an X-rated video. The following Monday, Jean discussed the incident with AEM's vice president for sales and a representative from HR All agreed that John's off-duty behavior constituted a serious violation of the company's code of conduct for employees, which read, in part, "Employee of duty behavior in no way should reflect unfavorably upon the company, its employees, or sales of any educational materials." AEM has traditionally held its sales representatives to high moral standards because the company sells extensively to public school administrators and teachers. At his discharge meeting, John vigorously opposed his firing While he acknowledged making the purchases, he argued strongly that what he did on his personal time was "no business of the company's" and his behavior in no way reflected unfavorably upon AEM or the sales of its products. Besides, he said, "The purchases were made as jokes for a stag party." Discussion Questions 1. Given the facts of this case, should John have been discharged? Why or why not? 2. Should the sales representatives of AEM be held to a higher standard of personal conduct than sales representatives for other types of organizations? Explain. 3. Should management have considered John's past work record before deciding on discharge? Explain

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Students Have Also Explored These Related General Management Questions!