Discuss, using external sources to back up your assertions, the "reasonably foreseeable" standard.Is George at risk?What factors should influence what one determines to be reasonably foreseeable? Can you think of scenarios where the outcome would not occur without a person's involvement, but the outcome is not reasonably foreseeable from her conduct? Should conduct that is reasonably foreseeable to result in a particular outcome give rise to liability, even if the outcome would have occurred without the individual's involvement? Why or why not?Should there be some sort of liability protection that overrides traditional tort law in the case of C19?