Discussion Forum According to Klein (2016), using ethical absolutism and ethical relativism in ethical decision making can lead to different outcomes. How can moral reasoning about a specific situation differ based on relativism or absolutism? Can you provide an illustration or example of an accounting procedure/situation whose outcome may differ based on absolutism or relativism? Is ethical relativism a more suitable standard within a global IFRS Environment? Why or why not?

Answer rating: 100% (QA)

Absolutism and Relativism Theories Absolutism theory postulates that the moral command is always true Moral commands are considered to be true in all ... View the full answer