Discussion Scenario: John Cridog, a developer, was building a development of townhouses called West Point, Texas. All the townhouses in the development were to have individual boat slips. Liam and Jessica Lutter, husband and wife, bought one of the townhouses. The sales contract between Cridog and the Lutters provided that a boat slip would be built and was included in the price of the townhouse. The contract stated that permission from the Texas Department of Natural Resources (TDNR) had to be obtained to build the boat slips. It is undisputed that a boat slip adds substantially to the value of the property and that the Lutters relied on the fact that the townhouse would have a boat slip Prior to the sale of the townhouse to the Lutters, the TDNR had informed Cridog that it objected to the plan to build the boat slips and that permission to build them would probably not be forthcoming. Cridog did not tell the Lutters this information but instead stated that there would be "no problem" getting permission from the state to build the boat slips. The Lutters purchased the townhouse. In the end, the TDNR would not approve the building of the boat slips for the Lutter's townhouse. Discussion Questions: After reviewing the learning materials in this Module, prepare an Initial Post that incorporates these materials to answer the following questions. Also, your grade in this learning activity relies on your engagement in the discussion through your Peer Replies (TWO or more) Topic Questions 1. Using the IRAC method, when the Lutters sued Cridog for damages for fraud after the TDNR did not approve the building, who wins the lawsuit? Why? 2. Explain why this would not be considered a mistake 3. What contractual remedies would the Lutters have if they win? What contractual remedy(ies) would you choose? Explain. an Discussion Scenario: John Cridog, a developer, was building a development of townhouses called West Point, Texas. All the townhouses in the development were to have individual boat slips. Liam and Jessica Lutter, husband and wife, bought one of the townhouses. The sales contract between Cridog and the Lutters provided that a boat slip would be built and was included in the price of the townhouse. The contract stated that permission from the Texas Department of Natural Resources (TDNR) had to be obtained to build the boat slips. It is undisputed that a boat slip adds substantially to the value of the property and that the Lutters relied on the fact that the townhouse would have a boat slip Prior to the sale of the townhouse to the Lutters, the TDNR had informed Cridog that it objected to the plan to build the boat slips and that permission to build them would probably not be forthcoming. Cridog did not tell the Lutters this information but instead stated that there would be "no problem" getting permission from the state to build the boat slips. The Lutters purchased the townhouse. In the end, the TDNR would not approve the building of the boat slips for the Lutter's townhouse. Discussion Questions: After reviewing the learning materials in this Module, prepare an Initial Post that incorporates these materials to answer the following questions. Also, your grade in this learning activity relies on your engagement in the discussion through your Peer Replies (TWO or more) Topic Questions 1. Using the IRAC method, when the Lutters sued Cridog for damages for fraud after the TDNR did not approve the building, who wins the lawsuit? Why? 2. Explain why this would not be considered a mistake 3. What contractual remedies would the Lutters have if they win? What contractual remedy(ies) would you choose? Explain. an