Dixon v. Deacon Morgan McEwan Easson, 1989 CanLII 2786 (BC SC) Did the auditors owe a duty
Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!
Question:
Dixon v. Deacon Morgan McEwan Easson, 1989 CanLII 2786 (BC SC)
- Did the auditors owe a duty to Dixon to be careful?
- If the auditors had known that the statements were being prepared to attract investors, would this affect your answer?
- Is this a just way of treating liability for professionals, or should they only be liable to the clients they have contracted with?
Related Book For
Business Law and the Legal Environment
ISBN: 978-1337736954
8th edition
Authors: Jeffrey F. Beatty, Susan S. Samuelson, Patricia Sanchez Abril
Posted Date: