DO NOT COPY ANSWER FROM CHEGG, otherwise i will give bad feedback, thanks

a) Imagine you are a consultant. 300-word minimum
Unsafe Products: Suppose a car manufactured by the Renault-Nissan-Mitsubishi alliance will explode when rear-ended and the driver and passengers will be burned alive. A cost-benefit analysis is done which determines whether the company can save $100 million if they do not recall the cars and instead give money to the families of those who were killed when the car exploded.
1) What is the ethical dilemma? Explain fully your point of view.

2) Explain how would you classify companies selling unsafe cars?

a) ethical and legal, b) ethical, but illegal, c) unethical, but legal, d) unethical and illegal?

3) Discuss fully if it is ethical or unethical to sell defective products and your rationale.

b) Imagine you are a consultant. 300-word minimum
Executive Actions: Based on the case study and the YouTube videos I posted, we know the Renault executive is accused of doing a variety of things that some consider controversial, unethical and even illegal. For example, having the company pay for a lavish event on his birthday.
4) Describe two such actions he took and explain fully why you feel his actions were either:
a) ethical and legal, b) ethical, but illegal, c) unethical, but legal, d) unethical and illegal?

5) What are your concerns and what actions would you recommend to the Renault executive team and Board of Directors?