Do you think that it should be legal to falsely implicate a suspect as a participant in a crime by suggesting that there is physical evidence from their person, reflecting that they were present at the scene? Explain.

2. If misleading actions on behalf of law enforcement are coercive, inappropriate, and lead to a false confession, should officers be held criminally responsible for their actions after the fact? Why or why not?
4. What additional interrogative strategies could have been employed in the investigation and interrogation of Michael Crowe that were not used, and why would you suggest using these approaches?
6. Expound upon both the ethical and moral violations and obligations that should be used during interrogations to ensure that coercive methods do not lead to a false confession.
8. List three reasons why juvenile populations may be motivated to falsely confess to criminal behavior that they did not commit and what strategies can be used to combat and prevent false confessions.
10. There are claims that the Miranda Warnings are not clear enough to be understood when read to a juvenile. Do you support this claim, and if so, what needs to be changed to make these rights transparent? If not, why do the current Miranda Warnings provide clear and logical explanations to minors in an interrogation? Explain.
12. Formulate a Christian worldview perspective that outlines and supports an ethical and Christlike approach to employ during interrogations.
14. APA References

Answer rating: 100% (QA)

1 Legality of Falsely Implicating a Suspect No it should not be legal to falsely implicate a suspect as a participant in a crime by suggesting there is physical evidence from their person placing them ... View the full answer