docs.google.com C History G case study - Google Docs Share case study File Edit View Insert Format Tools Add-ons Help Last edit was 3 days ago ~AT 100% - Title Economica * - 35 + B I U A . CO P M . = = = = 13 9: . 13. E E X 1 6 Lefty, Trucking Company and the American Truck Workers Union, the union that represented Lefty's workers, negotiated a collective bargaining agreement. In the BA (collective bargaining agreement), it stated that if a Lefty Trucking Company employee was discharged for a workplace rule violation, the matter would be submitted to an arbitrator. The BA agreement also limited the arbitrator to determine whether the rule was reasonable and whether the employee violated it. Later, Lefty Trucking discharged employee Junior Ramos and the union appealed to arbitration. The arbitrator determined that Ramos violated a reasonably safe rule, but was not convinced that Lefty Trucking should have treated the violation more seriously than other rule violations. The arbitrator ordered Ramos reinstated. Can a court set aside this order? Explain? RULES OR LAWS THAT APPLY TO THIS CASE: THE APPLICATION OF THESE RULES OF LAW TO THE FACTS OF THIS CASE: esc V Ro 07 do 0) delete W# Y N E R T U 1 C P Q tab S. . A S D F G H J K return ps lock Z X C V B M shit T command option control option command