Does 10K running time change when the runner listens to music? Nine runners were timed as they ran a 10K with and without listening to music. The running times in minutes are shown below.

Does 10K running time change when the runner listens to music? Nine runners were timed as they ran a 10K with and without listening to music. The running times in minutes are shown below. Running Time With 43 43 36 48 51 52 39 48 46 Music Without 44 43 27 49 41 39 37 41 44 Music Assume a Normal distribution. What can be concluded at the the a = 0.01 level of significance? For this study, we should use |Select an answer a. The null and alternative hypotheses would be: Ho: Select an answer |Select an answer v |Select an answer v H1: Select an answer v Select an answer |Select an answer v b. The test statistic |? v = (please show your answer to 2 decimal places.) c. The p-value = (Please show your answer to 4 decimal places. ) d. The p-value is ? v a e. Based on this, we should |Select an answer v the null hypothesis. f. Thus, the final conclusion is that ... The results are statistically insignificant at o = 0.01, so there is statistically significant evidence to conclude that the population mean running time with music is equal to the population mean running time without music. The results are statistically significant at a = 0.01, so there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the nine runners finished with different times on average with music compared to running without music. The results are statistically insignificant at a = 0.01, so there is insufficient evidence to conclude that the population mean running time with music is not the same as the population mean running time without music. The results are statistically significant at o = 0.01, so there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the population mean running time with music is not the same as the population mean running time without music