does my write up provides a clear and cohesive argument?

In Howard Zinn's "A People's History of the United States, " the encounter between Columbus and the Arawak people is depicted as a moment of cultural collision. The Arawaks, characterized by their generosity and openness, greeted Columbus and his men with gifts and hospitality. This starkly contrasted with Columbus's perception, as he noted their lack of weapons and viewed them as potential servants, reflecting a mindset of exploitation. The Arawaks' traits of sharing and curiosity were uncommon in Europe at the time, which was marked by religious and political power struggles. This encounter sets the stage for understanding the dynamics of colonialism and its enduring impact on Indigenous peoples. Zinn not only highlights the cultural differences between the Arawaks and Europeans but also foreshadows the devastating impact of European colonization on Indigenous societies. Columbus's view of the Arawaks as potential servants reveals the exploitative intentions that would drive European expansion across the Americas. The Arawaks' openness and lack of suspicion were met with a European mindset focused on conquest and resource extraction. The encounter between Columbus and the Arawak people exemplifies the beginning of a pattern where Indigenous peoples were often seen as obstacles or resources rather than as equals. The Arawaks welcomed Columbus with generosity and hospitality, which contrasted sharply with his exploitative mindset, as he viewed them as potential servants. This cultural clash highlights significant differences and foreshadows the devastating impact of European colonization on Indigenous societies. The Arawaks' openness was met with European ambitions of conquest and resource extraction, setting the stage for understanding the enduring effects of colonialism