Does the below look like a good start on my research paper preparation?

Instructions:

You will complete a research paper covering the most controversial of all the rights in the Bill of Rightsthe right to privacy. The purpose of this assignment is to help you analyze this right and its legacy as well as to think through the issues surrounding this right in the context of our legal, constitutional, and religious history.

The right to privacy was first created by the Supreme Court in its 1965 Griswold v. Connecticut ruling. Eight years later, the Court determined that the right to privacy was broad enough to include the right to an abortion.

Access Griswold v. Connecticut from any reputable website (two excellent websites are http://www.oyez.org/ and https://www.law.cornell.edu/). Analyze this case from both a loose constructionist and a strict interpretationist perspective. Apply the principles and knowledge that you have gained in this course regarding America's religious and legal history. In light of our Constitutional heritage and principles that you have learned in this course, which side is more consistent with our Constitutional heritage? Explain and discuss. Follow current Turabian formatting.

1. Thesis statement
2. A one paragraph discussion of where you see your paper going
3. An outline of your paper. At this point, 2-3 points and the 2-3 subpoints under each main point will suffice.
4. At least 5 quality sources that you expect to use
5. Any questions or challenges that you would like guidance on

What I wrote:

Thesis statement: The right to privacy is a natural right every person in the world desires and is a right given to citizens of nations that respect humanity and have a government that protects their God-given rights. Throughout history, the constitutional right to privacy interpretation has evolved thanks to cases such as Griswold v. Connecticut, a landmark case where loose constructionist justices were the majority.

One paragraph discussion: In Griswold v. Connecticut, the Supreme court ultimately decided in a 7-2 split decision that the Constitution protected the right to privacy regarding contraception for married women. Seven justices agreed that reading between the lines of the Constitution was permissible to show the Constitution protects the right to privacy in this manner. Amendments 1, 3, 4, 5, and 9 were cited as their loose constuctionist's view. Two justices had a more strict interpretation, noting that Amendments 9 and 10 should be used to sort the issue out, and the Constitution is not a document that should be loosely interpreted. Griswold v. Connecticut set the stage for other fights that would ensure over the right to privacy and the Constitution's loose or literal protection thereof.

I. Griswold v. Connecticut

A. Statement of facts

B. Griswold's argument

C. State of Connecticut's argument

D. Decision

II. Constitutional amendments cited in the Griswold v. Connecticut decision

A. A loose interpretation of the Amendments

B. A strict interpretation of the Amendments

C. The impact of the Griswold v. Connecticut decision

III. America's religious and legal history

A. American Constitutional heritage

B. The interpretation style more consistent with American Constitutional heritage

At least 5 quality sources:

1. Christianity and the Constitution by John Eidsmoe
2. Griswold v. Connecticut
3. Liberty, Order, and Justice by James McClellan
4. Roe v. Wade
5. Poe v. Ulmin
6. "Why We Can And Should Legislate Morality," The Federalist

Do you have any suggestions as to other points I should make? Thanks!