Does this information suggest disparate impact? For this example, would flow, stock, or concentration statistics provide you with the best answer?

Job Disparity? Consider the statistical representation of a hiring process shown in the table below. Job: Management Trainee Number of Applicants Number Hired Selection Rate Males Females Males Females Males Females Flow Statistics The 80% rule can be used with flow statistics to suggest if there might be evidence of disparate impact. The 80% rule compares the selection rates of different groups. The group with the highest selection rate is the benchmark group. If the selection rate for a protected class is less than 80% of the benchmark group, there might be disparate impact. Stock Statistics This evaluation compares the percentage of a group employed and the percentage of the group in the general population of the recruiting area. This approach requires analysis and does not lend itself to a 'rule of thumb' like the 80% rule, rather anomalies require further investigation. Concentration Statistics This approach looks at the number of a particular group in each job category, for example, management, maintenance, and clerical. This approach requires analysis and does not lend itself to a 'rule of thumb' like the 80% rule, rather anomalies require further investigation