dont look at the black part please answer the down one

Choose... NOTE: make sure to scroll down and Royal Bank of Canada v. Gill making your selection. Hercules Management v. Ernst & Young Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Company Rylands v. Fletcher Anns v. Merton, London Borough Council The legal principle behind this case Selkirk Petroleum Products Ltd. v. Husky Oil Ltd. is strict liability: if a person's actions R. v. Spratt More v. Bauer Nike Hockey Inc. are inherently dangerous, then the AMJ Campbell v. Kord Products Inc. occupier is liable for any damage Baid v. Aliments Rinag Foods Inc. they cause. Yin v. Liu Chopra v. Eaton (T.) Co. Hadley v. Baxendale For this case, the courts Haig v. Bamford determined that parties are able to Donoghue v. Stevenson exclude their liability, even for Choose... fundamental breach