Draft arguments in opposition to the following opponent's arguments.

This topic it could really go in any direction but in my opinion Lee Iacoccas decision of ignoring the problem was unethical and negligent but he should not be criminally charged. Lee Iacocca was trying to ensure that the American companies remain competitive in the small and affordable car market. Besides, he was also determined to provide employment to the citizens of the country and contribute towards the economic development. Lee Iacocca was not solely responsible for the decision. The other executives were well aware of the problem, so they were also equally responsible for selling the defective products to the customers. Hence, it can be said that Lee Iacocca should not be criminally charged for the deaths and injuries. We have to remember that Street crimes include the crimes that are committed by an individual or group in the streets like thefts, murder, trafficking, vandalism, etc. White collar crimes are committed by a person having high social status and reputation. These crimes are generally committed to obtain personal or business advantages and Lee Iacocca was doing it for the business development.