Drag each concept to its corresponding definition. 2 points Subcontrary claims A table of the logical relationships between four categorical claims that have the same subject and predicate terms References Square of opposition Two claims that can not both be true at the same time but can both be false at the same time Contradictory claims Two claims that can both be true at the same time but cannot both be false at the same time Contrary claims Two claims that are exact oppositesthat is, they could not both be true at the same time and could not both be false at the same time Match the following structures with the correct standard-form categorical claim type. 2 2 points Some S are P A-claim: References No Sare P E-claim: I-claim: All S are P O-claim Some S are not P 3 Drag each concept to its corresponding definition. 2 points References Contrapositive The claim that results from switching the places of the subject and predicate terms Obverse The claim that is directly across from it in the square of opposition, with the predicate term changed to its complementary term Converse The claim that results from switching the places of the subject and predicate terms in a categorical claim and replacing both terms with complementary terms 4 Drag each concept to its corresponding definition. 2. points Chain argument A numbered sequence of truth-functional symbolizations, each member of which validly follows from earlier members by one of the truth-functional rules References Conditional proof An argument consisting of a conditional claim as one premise, a claim that affirms the antecedent of the conditional as a second premise, and a claim that affirms the consequent of the conditional as the conclusion. Modus tollens An argument consisting of a conditional claim as one premise, a claim that denies the consequent of the conditional as a second premise, and a claim that denies the antecedent of the conditional as the conclusion. Deduction An argument consisting of three conditional claims in which the antecedents of one premise and the conclusion are the same, the consequents of the other premise and the conclusion are the same, and the consequent of the first premise and the antecedent of the second premise are the same. Modus ponens A deduction for a conditional claim "If P, then Q" that proceeds by assuming that P is true and then proving that, on that assumption, Q must also be true