Dubious emailed Major Corp. and ordered $3,000$ yards of fabric for an outdoor automobile display tent, first quality, $50\%$ nylon and $50\%$ orlon; no shipping terms were expressed. Major accepted the order and prepared the fabric for shipment but discovered that half of the fabric packed had been commingled with fabric that was $30\%$ nylon and $70\%$ orlon. Because Major did not have any additional $50\%$ nylon fabric, it decided to send the shipment to Dubious $$as an accommodation.$$ The goods were shipped, and later that same day, Major emailed Dubious its apology informing Dubious of the facts and indicating that $30\%-$nylon fabric would be priced at $$2$ a yard, which was less than originally quoted. The goods were destroyed on the way to Dubious$$ business when the carrier crashed. Under the circumstances, who bears the risk of loss?

a$.$ Dubious because he has title to the goods.

b$.$ Major because the order was not signed in writing.

c$.$ Dubious because the contract is construed to be a shipment contract.

d$.$ Major because it shipped nonconforming goods.

e$.$ None of the options are correct.