DUS 3032(military law) Case study question For all situations below, you are required to give comments on whether the punishment awarded "VALID" or "INVALID". Give reasons and explained why it is valid or invalid. Your answer must be supported by references as provided under the Armed Forces Act of 1972 and its rules and regulations. a. The Commanding Officer has summarily trial and awarded a fine of RM 30.00 to Kpl Zulkifli for drunkenness contrary to section 60 of the AFA 72. b. Kapt Osman Tan, a Subordinate Commander, has summarily trial and awarded a four- day extra guard duty to Kpl Fauzi for disobeying the Standing Order of the contrary to section 51 Of the AFA 72. C. Commander 12 Bde as the Appropriate Superior Authority has summarily trial and awarded 6-month forfeiture of seniority in the rank of lieutenant and a fine of RM 200.00 to Lt Mustaffa for wilfully damaging officer mess tv (service property) contrary to section 61(C) of the AFA 72. d. The Commander of 12 Bde as Appropriate Superior Authority (ASA) has summarily trial Captain Dollah Bin Dol for the offence of receiving a pair of night vision binoculars (public property) knowing it to have been stolen contrary to section 61 (b) of AFA 72 and sentenced to 6 months forfeiture of seniority in the rank of Captain