e Beberry purchases batteries for its from w defectel e w to explodeo phone and water while taking the pri c dhand and to ed in prot e ct s t they es on find the a breached pled warranty bloed toegera berhasil ideedback a Carles a la part the Gea a design defect in Goldman's food processor ring in that he w onder to prevlarl b ow that de the food pr o per and that is Goldman tuled to detely washim of the danger of a & G ame the relevante of or repose more Check My Wack n the e Steve brys a car from Teresa, who tells him that it is the best o anot a warranty b. the sort of presentation Cory 3 following list Blueberry purchases batteries for its smartphones from a manufacturer who is known to have a higher defect rate and whose batteries have been known to explode. Joey purchases the newest Blueberry phone, and one week later while talking on the phone it spontaneously catches on fire and burns his ear and hand. In order to succeed in a product liability negligence lawsuit, Joey will need to show that Blueberry: a. breached its implied warranty of merchantability when it installed the battery. O b. failed to use a less dangerous alternative that was economically feasible. O c. breached its implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose when it sold the phone. O d. failed to exercise reasonable duty of care in inspecting the batteries and testing the final product. The Look Sharp iron has a defect that causes it to increase to its highest possible heat when set on its lowest heat setting. Peggy sets the iron to its lowest setting and, ignoring the product's warning about ironing clothes while wearing them, uses the iron on the bottom of her shirt after putting the shirt on. She sustains severe burns on her stomach and requires a skin graft. The result of Peggy's lawsuit against Look Sharp is that: O a. Peggy is comparatively negligent in causing her injury. O b. Look Sharp is released from all liability due to Peggy's disregard of the product warning O c. Peggy must prove privity of contract if she is to prevail. O d. the design defect of the iron renders Look Sharp strictly liable. 10 Ana buys a car from Gabe. Unbeknownst to her, however, there is an outstanding lien on the car, and it is subsequently repossessed. Ana: O a. has no recourse against Gabe. O b. did not receive a warranty against infringement. O c. can disclaim the warranty. O d. is entitled to recover from Gabe for breach of warranty. Leon bought a gun from Fred's Gun Shop. Leon and Fred did not discuss Leon's making any inspection of the gun before he purchased it. A week later, Leon was cleaning the gun when it discharged and shot him in the foot. Leon sued Fred's Gun Shop, claiming the gun should have come with a warning not to clean it while loaded. What is likely to happen? O a. Because cleaning a loaded gun is a commonly known danger, Leon will not recover from Fred. O b. Fred will prevail with the defense of product misuse. O c. Fred can disclaim the warranty because Leon failed to inspect the gun. O d. Leon will recover because the lack of warning rendered the product not reasonably safe