Earlier this month, a train carrying toxic chemicals derailed in eastern Ohio, exploding into flames and unleashing

Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!

Question:

Earlier this month, a train carrying toxic chemicals derailed in eastern Ohio, exploding into flames and unleashing a spume of chemical smoke on the small town of East Palestine. The train's freight included vinyl chloride, a chemical known to cause liver cancer and other sicknesses.

In response, government and railway officials decided to "burn off" the vinyl chloride - effectively dumping 1.1m lbs of the chemical into the local community, according to a new lawsuit. Officials said that they did so to avert the vinyl chloride from exploding; in contrast, an attorney for the lawsuit has said that the decision was cheap, unsafe, and more interested in restoring train service and appeasing railway shareholders than protecting local residents.

East Palestine residents are reporting headaches, sore throats, and burning eyes; dead pets and chickens; and thousands of fish corpses in nearby waterways. The Ohio Department of Natural Resources has said that approximately 3,500 fish, of 12 different species, died across 7.5 miles.

In other words, Norfolk Southern's "controlled burn" may have caused a mushroom cloud of poison to spread over eastern Ohio. The situation demands immediate action from President Biden. Without it, thousands of people - including children and the elderly - and animals will be at continued risk of premature death. Biden must declare a state of emergency and independent taskforce to take over the remediation of this eco-catastrophe.

Norfolk Southern "basically nuked a town with chemicals" to "get a railroad open", a former hazmat technician told a local news outlet. It certainly seems like a company with a $55bn market cap chose to sacrifice the health of thousands of people to keep its profits flowing.

We need to try to understand how this happened.

For one thing, even the initial derailment wasn't necessarily just an "accident." It was a function of our out-of-control corporate culture in the United States, which has neutered effective government oversight of hazardous activities - including the rail transport of highly flammable and carcinogenic chemicals. The EPA's response thus far has been to send a feckless letter to Norfolk Southern pleading it pay for clean-up.

That's not going to cut it. We need to do better.

In terms of the sheer quantity of carcinogenic chemicals being released over an area of hundreds of miles, the catastrophe in Ohio is a major, unprecedented public health crisis. Biden must publicly recognize it as such and act to protect the people who live in the affected area. This requires a rapid, all-of-government response overseen not by the EPA but by independent scientists and taskmasters who will be immune to pressure from industry. This sort of taskforce must be willing to threaten the suspension or even nationalization of Norfolk Southern if it does not cooperate.

After battling an oil company over the discharge of toxic waste in the Amazon, I can say with some assurance that Norfolk's response to this crisis so far comes from a time-tested corporate strategy: manage the situation as a public relations challenge and not the humanitarian and ecological catastrophe that it is. Norfolk's leadership bailed out of a townhall meeting this week, blaming security risks, and has refused to face residents to answer questions.

That's certainly cowardice. But it is also a function of the fact that industry does not respect the power of government to regulate it. Government is supposed to protect us from the excesses of industry; instead it often acts like its partner.

If the consequences of not attending had included a sufficient threat to his bottom line, Norfolk Southern CEO Alan Shaw - who earns a reported $4.5m a year - probably would have been at the town hall. And if the government had been doing its job in the first place, there is a good chance this accident would not have happened. During the Trump administration, Norfolk successfully lobbied to repeal a safety rule requiring new electronic brakes. The train was also dangerously long - with only two crew members, and a trainee, supervising its 1.7-mile length.

I'm not a scientist. But I know a fair amount about toxicology and how the world's polluters use a playbook invented by law firms and consultants to downplay the impact of major disasters and lower their legal liability. Local and state officials - who may be under enormous pressure from these industries in the form of campaign donations - often work alongside polluters to "manage" disasters' political fallout.

It's a one-two punch of disaster mismanagement that is playing out now, in Ohio, with awful consequences for people and the planet. Here are three takeaways about what is really happening and what needs to be done:

Be skeptical of claims by authorities that it is "safe" to return to the area. The EPA and state environmental officials have been opaque about what chemicals are being tested for and by what methods, and news reports haven't indicated any plans so far for any sort of environmental restoration. We also do not know what new chemical compounds the so-called "controlled" burn may have created, and whether tests have been run for those chemicals. In fact, test results have not even been released publicly.

Bottom line: there is no transparent scientific or public health basis for declaring the area safe. Until there is, I wouldn't go near the site of the disaster.

The EPA can help, but cannot oversee a clean-up. Corporate lobbying in recent years has undermined the ability of the EPA to regulate industry. Under the Trump administration, chemical lobbyists took over important jobs on the inside and the agency is severely understaffed. Further, the EPA is required by Congress to "balance" industry needs with public safety. It is not focused solely on protecting the community. It sent a letter to Norfolk pleading with it to pay for a cleanup; a real government would have sent a disaster management team to Ohio to take over.

Longer-term, the railway industry needs to be revamped. We have civil-war era braking systems on trains carrying deadly chemicals though our communities. Railway unions and whistleblowers have repeatedly raised safety concerns only to be ignored. A new industry concept called "precision scheduling" has pushed trains and workers to the breaking point to extract greater profits for shareholders, which include some of the largest hedge funds on Wall Street.

Our government institutions as currently constituted are unable or unwilling to respond effectively to industrial disasters. It is preposterous for any ostensibly advanced country to let a massive chemical polluter clean up a mess like this on its own terms and without effective oversight. This is not an isolated incident. Unless we demand accountability, it will happen again.

Analyze above issue, and explain what chosen theory would argue about the law/legal issue.If using functionalism, Marxist, or intersectionality be sure to fully explain what the theory's lens would say about the issue.