$[$Elton$$s Electronics$]$ Elton$$s Electronics sells electronic housewares. Elton is looking for a new supplier to produce the standard$-$sized switch plate for a best$-$selling blender. He contacts Porter and provides Porter with specifications for where the switches on the switch plate should be placed. Porter provides excellent pricing and delivery terms, which would save Elton a lot of money. Elton and Porter sign a contract for Porter to produce $10,000$ standard$-$sized switch plates according to Elton$$s specifications. When the completed switch plates arrive, Elton$$s employees attach them to the blenders, however, the standard$-$sized switch plates are two millimeters too long. Elton is furious and calls Porter, who says Elton can send back the switch plates and Porter$$s company can rework them, but there will be a fee because the switch plates he shipped were $$standard$-$size$$ switch plates, as specified in the contract. Elton disagrees and hangs up the phone. Elton$$s technician measures both the switch plates and the blender and discovers that the blender face where the switch plate is attached is two millimeters shorter than the well$-$known $$standard$-$size$$ switch plate. The technician suggests they could shave off two millimeters from Porter$$s boards to make them fit on the blenders, however, it would be a lot of work.

Is Elton likely to be successful in a lawsuit that seeks to void or rescind the contract?

Group of answer choices

Yes, because it was a mistake of fact.

Yes, because both parties were mistaken about what constitutes a $$standard$-$size$$ switch plate, and where there was a mutual mistake, either party may choose to rescind the contract.

No$,$ because only Elton, not Porter, was mistaken about what constitutes a $$standard$-$size$$ switch plate, and a unilateral mistake generally does not void a contract.

Yes, because a unilateral mistake voids a contract.

No$,$ because courts rarely allow rescission in cases of a mutual mistake.