Question: Employee, a skydiving instructor, generally informs his customers that he is homosexual so that his female customers will not feel awkward when he is strapped
Employee, a skydiving instructor, generally informs his customers that he is homosexual so that his female customers will not feel awkward when he is strapped to them. A females husband called the company and complained about employee doing this and employee is terminated.
In June 2020, the US Supreme Court ruled on Bostock v. Clayton County (GA).
- What's the linkeage between these two cases?
- The US Supreme Court issued a ruling that is now the "law of the land." What precedent did they establish?
- How does this impact front-line HR practitioners
- How does this impact policy makers in an HR Dept?
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
