Question: E-portfolio Reflection: Guidelines and Rubric * Each student must submit an INDIVIDUAL reflection on EITHER the Video Commentary or Activity Presentation assignments completed for this





E-portfolio Reflection: Guidelines and Rubric * Each student must submit an INDIVIDUAL reflection on EITHER the Video Commentary or Activity Presentation assignments completed for this course. Your reflection for the e-portfolio counts for 5% of your final grade. * Each reflection should AT LEAST be 500 words: 1.5 spaced, in Times New Roman font size 12, 1 inch (2.54cm) margin for all sides (Assessed) * Before you start writing the reflection, think about the BTC Teacher Competency(ies) that this course, and particularly the assignment you have chosen for the reflection, has helped you acquire. * Your reflection should address the following points: - A very brief introduction explaining the assignment and its purpose as you understand it. - An explanation of how you, not the group, approached this assignment to complete it. For example, did you refer to the course materials, your TP material, the library, or the internet? Did you follow certain steps to complete it in a timely and organized manner? - An explanation of how this assignment has helped you acquire certain BTC Teacher Competencies. Mention specific examples. - An explanation of how this content course - which focused on improving your teacher talk in the classroom - has affected your ongoing progress as a learner/teacher, and how it can help you become a better teacher in the future. (Give specific examples). Important Notes: * The reflection is an in-depth analysis of the learning experience that value of the derived learning to self or others. Hence, your reflection needs to demonstrate a range of analytical practices supported by clear, detailed examples. Your reflection must include clear references to the content of the course. * Your reflection must be thoughtful, thorough, and well-written. You will lose major points if your reflection does not exhibit these attributes. * See the BTC grading rubric above. Pay attention to the additional grading criteria for this assignment given as follows: Response includes all components and meets or exceeds all requirements indicated in the instructions. Each question or part of the assignment is addressed thoroughly. Response includes most components and meets most requirements indicated in the instructions. Almost all questions or parts of the assignment are addressed. Response is missing some components and/or does not fully meet the requirements indicated in the instructions. Some questions or parts of the assignment are not addressed. Response does not address the requirements indicated in the instructions. Many parts of the assignment are addressed minimally, inadequately, and/or not at all. * Your reflection is due on 29th May. The document must be labeled as following: your name, course code and title. Here's an example: Hasan-TC2EN244- E-Portfolio Reflection Introduction Grade-3 Family and Friends 3 unit-8 Look at the animal lesson-1 words Age Group: 9-10 years level of learners: Beginners Able to read and write simple words Teacher's Talk Teacher's Communication Style Establishing good and interactive relationship Giving Directions and Instructions Giving Effective Feedback and Praise Focus point Areas of improvement Communication Style (Assertive Authoritative): The students were encouraged to interact which promotes selfconfidence and creativity. Establishing good and interactive relationshin. Establishing good and interactive relationship : The students were well motivated to engage in all kinds of activities throughout the lesson, which made them hyperactive. Giving Effective Feedback and Praise: Instead of repeating the same phrases ("Good Girl"), different and individual feedback could be more focused. focus on asking student's feedback on dinderstanding or in terms of how engaging the engaging more senses in teacning
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
