EQUIPOTENTIALS EXPERIMENT L Answer the following questions below using complete sentences: 1. Were the mean electric field magnitudes for either ink pattern monotonic? If so, was it monotonic increasing or monotonic decreasing? 2. Overall, were you mean electric field magnitudes precise or imprecise for the Parallel-Plate pattern? Justify your conclusion. 3. Overall, were you mean electric field magnitudes precise or imprecise for the second ink pattern? Justify your conclusion. 4. Were the equipotential surfaces for the two ink patterns identical? Should they have been? 5. Identify the independent variable(s) for this experiment. Be specific and use proper vocabulary- 6. Fixed variables are qualities and/or quantities that are held constant throughout the entire experiment. Identify the fixed variable(s) in this experiment. Be specific and use proper vocabulary. 7. Identify the dependent variable(s) for this experiment. Be specific and use proper vocabulary.EQUIPOTENTAILS EXPERIMENT EQUIPOTENTAILS EXPERIMENT L Calculations Table of Results - Parallel-Plate Ink Pattern Parallel-Plate Pattern - 1.000 V AND 0 V Equipotential Surfaces MEAN ELECTRIC FIELD MAGNITUDE EQUIPOTENTIAL Mean Electric Field Magnitude SURFACES Eavg 1 4E (N/C) V2 - V1 Eavg Ar 1.000 V and O V 84.75+0.2 1.000V - 0.00OV Eavg 0.01180m 2.000 V and 1.000 V 76.92+0.2 3.000 V and 2.000 V 70.92+0.2 Electric Field Magnitude Percent Uncertainty 4.000 V and 3.000 V 78.37+0.2 SV2 2 OVI 8(Ar) 2 AE = LAVI + IAV + X 100% Ar 5.00 V and 4.000 V 10410.3 0.0017\\ 2 0.0017\\ 2 (0.00002m 2 AE = + 1V 1V + 0.01180 X 100% Table of Results - Second Ink Pattern EQUIPOTENTIAL MEAN ELECTRIC FIELD MAGNITUDE SURFACES Eavg 1 4E (N/C) 1.000 V and O V 70.13+0.2 2.000 V and 1.000 V 36.63+0.2 3.000 V and 2.000 V 28.25+0.2 4.000 V and 3.000 V 37.3410.2 5.00 V and 4.000 V 66.23+0.2EQUIPOTENTIALS EXPERIMENT Data Table - Parallel Plates Ink Pattern DISTANCE EQUIPOTENTIAL SURFACES Ar 1 6(Ar) ( cm ) 1.000 V and 0 V 1.180+0.002 2.000 V and 1.000 V 1.300+0.002 3.000 V and 2.000 V 1.410+0.002 4.000 V and 3.000 V 1.276+0.002 5.00 V and 4.000 V 0.960 +0.002 Data Table - Second Ink Pattern DISTANCE EQUIPOTENTIAL SURFACES Ar 1 6(Ar) ( cm ) 1.000 V and 0 V 1.426+0.002 2.000 V and 1.000 V 2.730+0.002 3.000 V and 2.000 V 3.540+0.002 4.000 V and 3.000 V 2.678+0.002 5.00 V and 4.000 V 1.510+0.002+ + + + + + + + -+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + -+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +8- + + +it + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 8- + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +. + + 8-1 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +/ + + + + + + + +/ + + + + + + + PK-#4 CONDUCTIVE PAPER REPRODUCE TO MAKE ENI TIENTIES SUCETE + + + + + +. + + + + s+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + THE CRIO PATTERN ON PASCO SO ENTIFIC LOOOOL FR + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + -+ + + + + + + + BLACK LINE MASTER OF THE +: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 0- + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + *- + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +