Question: Estimated Income Statements, using Absorption and Variable Costing Prior to the first month of operations ending October 31, Marshall Inc. estimated the following operating results:
Estimated Income Statements, using Absorption and Variable Costing
Prior to the first month of operations ending October 31, Marshall Inc. estimated the following operating results:
| Sales (17,600 x $60) | $1,056,000 | ||
| Manufacturing costs (17,600 units): | |||
| Direct materials | 642,400 | ||
| Direct labor | 151,360 | ||
| Variable factory overhead | 70,400 | ||
| Fixed factory overhead | 84,480 | ||
| Fixed selling and administrative expenses | 23,000 | ||
| Variable selling and administrative expenses | 27,800 | ||
The company is evaluating a proposal to manufacture 19,200 units instead of 17,600 units, thus creating an ending inventory of 1,600 units. Manufacturing the additional units will not change sales, unit variable factory overhead costs, total fixed factory overhead cost, or total selling and administrative expenses.
a. 1. Prepare an estimated income statement, comparing operating results if 17,600 and 19,200 units are manufactured in the absorption costing format. If an amount box does not require an entry leave it blank.
| Marshall Inc. | ||
| Absorption Costing Income Statement | ||
| For the Month Ending October 31 | ||
| 17,600 Units Manufactured | 19,200 Units Manufactured | |
| $fill in the blank | $fill in the blank | |
| Cost of goods sold: | ||
| $fill in the blank 0bcec2f6b00201e_5 | $fill in the blank 0bcec2f6b00201e_6 | |
| fill in the blank 0bcec2f6b00201e_8 | fill in the blank 0bcec2f6b00201e_9 | |
| $fill in the blank | $fill in the blank | |
| $fill in the blank | $fill in the blank | |
| fill in the blank | fill in the blank | |
| $fill in the blank | $fill in the blank | |
a. 2. Prepare an estimated income statement, comparing operating results if 17,600 and 19,200 units are manufactured in the variable costing format. If an amount box does not require an entry leave it blank.
| Marshall Inc. | ||
| Variable Costing Income Statement | ||
| For the Month Ending October 31 | ||
| 17,600 Units Manufactured | 19,200 Units Manufactured | |
| $fill in the blank | $fill in the blank | |
| Variable cost of goods sold: | ||
| $fill in the blank | $fill in the blank | |
| fill in the blank | fill in the blank | |
| $fill in the blank | $fill in the blank | |
| $fill in the blank | $fill in the blank | |
| fill in the blank | fill in the blank | |
| $fill in the blank | $fill in the blank | |
| Fixed costs: | ||
| $fill in the blank | $fill in the blank | |
| fill in the blank | fill in the blank | |
| Total fixed costs | $fill in the blank | $fill in the blank |
| $fill in the blank | $fill in the blank | |
b. What is the reason for the difference in operating income reported for the two levels of production by the absorption costing income statement?
The increase in income from operations under absorption costing is caused by the allocation of ______ (fixed factory/variable) overhead cost over a _______ (fewer/larger) number of units. Thus, the cost of goods sold is _____(less/more) . The difference can also be explained by the amount of_____(fixed factory/variable) overhead cost included in the_____ ( beginning/ending) inventory.
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
