Examine the following situations and determine whether federal jurisdiction applies to each and, if so, what type.

Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!

Question:

Kyle and Cindy were both driving when their cars collided. Both suffered serious injuries. Each claim that the accident was the fault of the other driver. Kyle and Cindy were both domiciled in state F at the time of the accident, which occurred in state O. Kyle and Cindy were both driving when their cars collided. Both suffered serious injuries. Each claim that the accident was the fault of the other driver. Kyle and Cindy were both domiciled in state F at the time of the accident, which occurred in state O. Alicia was a passenger in Kyle's car and was also injured in the accident. Alicia is a resident of state O. Kyle and Cindy were both driving when their cars collided. Both suffered serious injuries. Each claim that the accident was the fault of the other driver. Kyle was domiciled in state F at the time of the accident, which occurred in state O, where Cindy was domiciled. Kyle and Cindy were both driving when their cars collided. Both suffered serious injuries. Each claim that the accident was the fault of the other driver. Kyle and Cindy were both domiciled in state F at the time of the accident, which occurred in state O. Also destroyed in the accident was a U.S. interstate sign valued at $2,000. The government plans to join the suit to seek damages for the sign. Kyle and Cindy were both driving when their cars collided. Both suffered serious injuries. Each claim that the accident was the fault of the other driver. Kyle and Cindy were both domiciled in state F at the time of the accident, which occurred in state O. The basis for Cindy's suit is that Kyle was driving a home-crafted electric car he made himself that does not meet the legal requirements for operation on an interstate highway. Kyle claims that the law is an unconstitutional violation of his right to travel freely.