Expanding on overall case study , could you please provide a solution for this? How this thing is explained and communicated well in mail format

During a meeting with ALAF and the Minister of Finance, the scenario you provided in Task 3 was discussed. The Minister of Finance is in favor of recommending a bond-only portfolio. However, an auditor of the ALAF stated that duration matching techniques only increase the contribution amount per employed person, and thus investing in equity is preferred. The auditor strongly opposes the proposed duration technique and instead advocates for using the key-rate duration technique, effective duration, or convexity. Following the meeting, the Minister of Finance requested that you provide the following: . An overview of the different duration techniques and explain how the use of the techniques the auditor mentioned differ from the duration techniques you used in your analysis in Task 3. An analysis of adding the following investment options to the bond-only portfolio, and make a recommendation as to which, if any, of the investments are appropriate: o real estate investment o infrastructure investment o investment in Build Large Inc. You do not need to perform any calculations. Consider the duration matching environment as you discuss these options. Create your email to the Minister of Finance of Cascadia in the appropriate section of the Microsoft Word template.