Explain why the House of Lords in noble v. Devon county council was not bound to follow
Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!
Question:
Transcribed Image Text:
the uemntion [Para 6] Mr. Reuben, who appeared for Mr. Noble, put forward an attractive argument on construction. He said that although the Act of 1959 was a consolidation Act, the court should interpret section 44(1) of the Act of 1959 in the same way as if it formed part of a new Act. This was for two reasons. First, it was not simply a consolidation Act. It also contained amendments. Section 44(1) might therefore have been intended to amend the previous law by extending the duties of highway authorities from maintenance of the fabric to other forms of maintenance necessary to prevent the highway from being dangerous to the public. Secondly, even in the case of a pure consolidation Act, the courts should not delve into the antecedent legislation unless the obscurity of the statutory language made it necessary to do so. As Lord Wilberforce said in Farrell v. Alexander [1977]: "self-contained statutes, whether consolidating previous law, or so doing with amendments, should be interpreted, if reasonably possible, without recourse to antecedents, and that the recourse should only be had when there is a real and substantial difficulty or ambiguity which classical methods of construction cannot resolve" [Para 7] Mr. Reuben [counsel for Mr. Noble] said that there was no real ambiguity about section 44(1) read with the definition in s259 of the 1959 Act. If maintenance "includes" repair, it must also include something else. Thus, the concept must be wider than merely repairing the fabric of the highway. As a matter of ordinary language, "maintenance" is capable of including salting and gritting. No one would think it an odd use of language to say that the gritting lorries were used for highway maintenance. Furthermore, if one looks to the purpose of the Page 4 of 12 legislation, the reason why a highway authority is under a duty to maintain the highway is to ensure that it can be used with safety by members of the public. By 1959 it was recognised that this required the removal of snow and ice. Highway authorities had in practice been spreading salt and grit on the roads for a number of years. It would be anomalous if the highway authority had a duty to eliminate potholes but was not required to do anything about the more insidious hazards of black ice. Another anomaly would be the distinction between the duty of a highway authority in respect of the dangerous state of the highway and the liability of an adjoining owner in public nuisance for causing danger to persons on the highway. The latter would be far stricter: for example, in Slater v. Worthington's Cash Stores (1930) Ltd. [1941] a property owner was held liable for failing to remove snow from his roof, so that a minor avalanche injured a passer-by on the pavement. Baker v. Essex County Council [1977] Q.B. 441 [Para 8] My Lords, I have said that Mr. Reuben's argument was attractive and in Baker v. Essex County Council [1977] it was accepted in principle by the majority... in the Court of Appeal. It was however rejected by Lord Denning M.R. In a judgment written at the age of 78 which, if I may say so with respect, displays to the full his formidable learning and powers of analysis and lucid exposition, he explained why, notwithstanding the definition, the liability to "maintain the highway" was concerned only with keeping the fabric in repair. The majority opinion was followed by the Court of Appeal in Cross v. Kirklees Metropolitan Borough Council [1998] and in the present case... My Lords, I will say at once that I find the judgment of Lord Denning M.R. completely convincing. Perhaps I really need to say no more. But out of respect for Mr. Reuben's argument I shall give my reasons in my own words. The context of the Act of 1959 [Para 9] My Lords, I quite accept that as a matter of ordinary speech, the "maintenance" of the highway is capable of including salting and gritting and the removal of ice and snow. On the other hand, the context in which the words appear may give them a narrower meaning. It seems to me quite impossible, in construing the Act of 1959, to shut one's eyes to the fact that it was not a code which sprang fully formed from the legislative head but was built upon centuries of older highway law. The provisions of the 1959 Act itself invited reference to the earlier law and in some cases were unintelligible without them. [Para 10] Thus section 38(1) 1959 Act provided that thenceforth "no duty with respect to the maintenance of a highway shall lie on the inhabitants at large of any area." Section 38(2) 1959 Act provided that a highway which, immediately before the commencement of the Act, was maintainable by the inhabitants at large or maintainable by a highway authority, should be, for the purposes of the Act, a highway "maintainable at public expense" [Para 11] In order to understand these provisions, it is necessary to know that at common law the "inhabitants at large"2 of a parish were under a duty to keep its highways in repair. The 1959 Act was thus using "maintenance," in the defined sense, as equivalent to the previous duty of the inhabitants at large, which was to keep the highways in repair. The common law duty was enforceable by proceedings on indictment in the nature of a prosecution for the uemntion [Para 6] Mr. Reuben, who appeared for Mr. Noble, put forward an attractive argument on construction. He said that although the Act of 1959 was a consolidation Act, the court should interpret section 44(1) of the Act of 1959 in the same way as if it formed part of a new Act. This was for two reasons. First, it was not simply a consolidation Act. It also contained amendments. Section 44(1) might therefore have been intended to amend the previous law by extending the duties of highway authorities from maintenance of the fabric to other forms of maintenance necessary to prevent the highway from being dangerous to the public. Secondly, even in the case of a pure consolidation Act, the courts should not delve into the antecedent legislation unless the obscurity of the statutory language made it necessary to do so. As Lord Wilberforce said in Farrell v. Alexander [1977]: "self-contained statutes, whether consolidating previous law, or so doing with amendments, should be interpreted, if reasonably possible, without recourse to antecedents, and that the recourse should only be had when there is a real and substantial difficulty or ambiguity which classical methods of construction cannot resolve" [Para 7] Mr. Reuben [counsel for Mr. Noble] said that there was no real ambiguity about section 44(1) read with the definition in s259 of the 1959 Act. If maintenance "includes" repair, it must also include something else. Thus, the concept must be wider than merely repairing the fabric of the highway. As a matter of ordinary language, "maintenance" is capable of including salting and gritting. No one would think it an odd use of language to say that the gritting lorries were used for highway maintenance. Furthermore, if one looks to the purpose of the Page 4 of 12 legislation, the reason why a highway authority is under a duty to maintain the highway is to ensure that it can be used with safety by members of the public. By 1959 it was recognised that this required the removal of snow and ice. Highway authorities had in practice been spreading salt and grit on the roads for a number of years. It would be anomalous if the highway authority had a duty to eliminate potholes but was not required to do anything about the more insidious hazards of black ice. Another anomaly would be the distinction between the duty of a highway authority in respect of the dangerous state of the highway and the liability of an adjoining owner in public nuisance for causing danger to persons on the highway. The latter would be far stricter: for example, in Slater v. Worthington's Cash Stores (1930) Ltd. [1941] a property owner was held liable for failing to remove snow from his roof, so that a minor avalanche injured a passer-by on the pavement. Baker v. Essex County Council [1977] Q.B. 441 [Para 8] My Lords, I have said that Mr. Reuben's argument was attractive and in Baker v. Essex County Council [1977] it was accepted in principle by the majority... in the Court of Appeal. It was however rejected by Lord Denning M.R. In a judgment written at the age of 78 which, if I may say so with respect, displays to the full his formidable learning and powers of analysis and lucid exposition, he explained why, notwithstanding the definition, the liability to "maintain the highway" was concerned only with keeping the fabric in repair. The majority opinion was followed by the Court of Appeal in Cross v. Kirklees Metropolitan Borough Council [1998] and in the present case... My Lords, I will say at once that I find the judgment of Lord Denning M.R. completely convincing. Perhaps I really need to say no more. But out of respect for Mr. Reuben's argument I shall give my reasons in my own words. The context of the Act of 1959 [Para 9] My Lords, I quite accept that as a matter of ordinary speech, the "maintenance" of the highway is capable of including salting and gritting and the removal of ice and snow. On the other hand, the context in which the words appear may give them a narrower meaning. It seems to me quite impossible, in construing the Act of 1959, to shut one's eyes to the fact that it was not a code which sprang fully formed from the legislative head but was built upon centuries of older highway law. The provisions of the 1959 Act itself invited reference to the earlier law and in some cases were unintelligible without them. [Para 10] Thus section 38(1) 1959 Act provided that thenceforth "no duty with respect to the maintenance of a highway shall lie on the inhabitants at large of any area." Section 38(2) 1959 Act provided that a highway which, immediately before the commencement of the Act, was maintainable by the inhabitants at large or maintainable by a highway authority, should be, for the purposes of the Act, a highway "maintainable at public expense" [Para 11] In order to understand these provisions, it is necessary to know that at common law the "inhabitants at large"2 of a parish were under a duty to keep its highways in repair. The 1959 Act was thus using "maintenance," in the defined sense, as equivalent to the previous duty of the inhabitants at large, which was to keep the highways in repair. The common law duty was enforceable by proceedings on indictment in the nature of a prosecution for
Expert Answer:
Answer rating: 100% (QA)
Answer In the case of Noble v Devon County Council the House of Lords was not bound to follow the majority decision made in the earlier case of Baker ... View the full answer
Related Book For
International Marketing And Export Management
ISBN: 9781292016924
8th Edition
Authors: Gerald Albaum , Alexander Josiassen , Edwin Duerr
Posted Date:
Students also viewed these law questions
-
Explain why the House of Lords in Noble v. Devon County Council was not bound to follow the majority decision made in the earlier case of Baker v. Essex County Council [1977].
-
Exercises 11-16: For the measured quantity, state the set of numbers that most appropriately describes it. Choose from the natural numbers, integers, and rational numbers. Explain your answer....
-
Teo sells a set of videotapes on an online auction. The postal service he prefers puts these restrictions on the size of a package: Up to 150 lb Up to 130 in. in length and girth combined Up to 108...
-
Monteagudo-Playa SA is a take-away food store at a popular beach resort. Consuelo Herreros, owner of Monteagudo-Playa, is deciding how much refrigerator space to devote to four different drinks....
-
What is net cash flow from investing activities? (a) $14,000 (b) ($14,000) (c) $21,000 (d) ($16,000) The following information is available for Jacquis Jewelry and Gift Store: Net income Depreciation...
-
Dudley Bank has the following balance sheet and income statement. For Dudley Bank, calculate: a. Return on equity b. Return on assets c. Asset utilization d. Equity multiplier e. Profit margin f....
-
A section of the allied quality assurance publication 2070 request for government quality assurance captures information on deviation permits concessions and reporting. The information comes from...
-
BB fans. The following are the details of the inventories for the year ended 31 December TW Berhad involves in supplying decorative celling fans which are Type AA and Type 2021. Invoice price per...
-
A recent study of mergers and acquisitions found that 83 percent of the deals achieved did not result in positive shareholder returns. Some resulted in losses. a. If such mergers are not especially...
-
American Airlines offered a 50-percent-off sale and cut fares. Continental Airlines and Northwest Airlines sued American Airlines over this action. a. What was the likely basis of the suit? b. How...
-
While some assets, such as forests, can provide benefits to society in perpetuity, some firms see forests as consumable assets. One example occurred when corporate raider James Goldsmith forcibly...
-
Economist Edward Prescott observed that while Americans worked 5 percent fewer hours per week than the French in the 1970s, they worked 50 percent more hours per week in the early 2000s. He found...
-
Economists Mark Blaug and Ruth Towse studied the market for economists in Britain and found that the quantity demanded was about 150 to 200 a year, and that the quantity supplied was about 300 a...
-
Select any natural hazard and suggest how it might interact with various human actions to create a disaster. Suggest ways to lessen the effects of such an event. why is research on offenders so...
-
2.) Find the Laplace transform of f(t) 7e-St cos 2t +9 sinh2 2t. Use Laplace Table. %3D
-
Evaluate the following drafts. What parts should be omitted? What needs to be changed or added? What parts would benefit from specific supporting details? 1. Dear_ There is more to a buyer's job than...
-
Use five different websites to investigate three companies in your career field. Look at salary guides for your level of qualifications, product/service information, news articles about the...
-
Interview someone working in a field youre interested in. Use the following questions to get started: How did you get started in this field? What do you like about your job? What do you dislike...
Study smarter with the SolutionInn App