dissent in this case (not inauaea here). Juage Brettel noted that the evidence was that Mrs. Wolfe had a psychological condition such that her trauma "could never have occurred unless she. to begin with. was extraordinarily vulnerable to severe shock at or away from her place of employment or one produced by accident or iniury to those close to her in employment or in her private life." The judge worried that "one can easily call up a myriad of commonplace occupational pursuits where employees are often exposed to the misfortunes of others which may in the mentally unstable evoke precisely the symptoms which this claimant suffered." He concluded. "In an era marked by examples of overburdening of socially desirable programs with