f an employer decided to allow poor management and structure to result in the separation of talented staff (i.e., - leaving for better work environments), would that be an example ofCorporate Darwinism? If a capitalist society is dependent (to a degree) on competition, and an employer decided to drive away staff, instead of retaining them; isn't that a benefit to the competitors of that firm? Could competitor firms actually have a competitive advantage and result in measurable benefits (such as increased retention, lower turnover, lower recruitment costs, etc.)