\f3 . . . . . .. . E . . . . . .. . 20220723_091819.jpg . . . . . . . . .. . f4 . . . . 4 . . . . . . . .. . .. . . . R . . . *= (X-1)(Y-1) parameters 15 p value increases % . . . '= X - 1 - number of 5 estimated distribution have some meaningful relationship to counts 2-way classification table Tests if category labels in a T Tests if multiple unspecified 20220723_091751.jpg 6 Y H . . a . . U . . '. increases 8. HO is rejected . . ' . . . 6. As the difference between of X rows and Y columns . . 7. As the test statistic decreases . . . 19 144 . . . observed and expected counts 5. DF for a goodness of fit with X cells 4. DF for a two-way contingency table . . . . . . . ' . . . . 9 . . . . . . . . . . K .. . . . X O .. . . . . . . . . . . .. . .. .. . P " . . . . . .. . . . .' .... . ". .. .observed and expected counts increases Tests if category labels in a 2-way classification table have some meaningful 7. As the test statistic decreases relationship to counts 8. HO is rejected Tests if multiple unspecified probability distributions are the same Next Page Page 7 of 10 Previous Page 20220723_091819.jpg 20220723_09175TJPg 19 X a . . . . .' . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . ' . . . . . . . . . . . ' . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . ... ... . . . .. . .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . .. . F11 F12 AV 19 144 P DI f7 15 13 & 9 % 8 5 6 # 3 4 P T Y U O E R K