Final Value Reduced Cost Objective Coefficient Allowable Increase 0 Allowable Decrease IE+30 1E+30 0 35 -8 0 30 8 0 0 9 0 0 450 750 300 400 300 0 40 32 37 40 42 Cell Name SBS11 Cleveland to Boston SC$11 Cleveland to Richmond SD$11 Cleveland to Atlanta SES11 Cleveland to St. Louis $B$12 Detroit to Boston $C$12 Detroit to Richmond SD$12 Detroit to Atlanta SES12 Detroit to St. Louis $B$13 Greensboro to Boston SC$13 Greensboro to Richmond SDS13 Greensboro to Atlanta SES13 Greensboro to St. Louis Constraints 8 0 0 2 1E+30 5 IE+30 0 9 1E+30 28 25 9 0 -9 400 0 2 1E-30 5 IE+30 1E+30 1E+30 0 0 25 40 15 20 28 -28 -25 -12 0 Call SBS15 SC$15 SDS15 SES15 SGS11 SG$12 $G$13 Final Value 1100 400 750 750 Name ant supplied to Boston amt supplied to Richmond ant supplied to Atlanta ant supplied to St. Louis Cleveland amt used Detroit amt used Greensboro amt used Shadow Price 35 45 40 32 Constraint R.H. Side 1100 400 750 750 1200 1000 Allowable Decrease 400 300 450 Allowable Increase 0 0 0 0 1E+30 450 300 750 1200 0 0 0 1000 800 2 5 800 reduce its requirement before a totally different transportation plan emerges? Suppose you, as manager like the current transportation plan. Boston is looking to substantially reduce its total demand from 1100. How far down can Boston a. It cannot be reduced, so remains at 1100 b. It can be reduced by 400 to 700. c. It can be reduced by 300 to 800. d. It can be reduced by 350 to 450