Financial Statement Analysis: Include relevant key financial ratios with a brief interpretation for each ratio as they apply to the company and/or industry. Is the company financially sound?

M Assingment - annur.s.pasha@ X Binder3.pdf E BMGT 304 Major Project - Goox C Financial Statement Analysis: X M Assingment - annur.s.pasha@ + C 0 File /Users/annurpasha/Downloads/Binder3.pdf : Binder3.pdf 5 / 5 100% + EXHIBIT 7 The Green Music Center as a Percentage of the Sonoma State University Budget* 2 Foundation GF 0.1% Green Music Center, 3.5% Campus Life SSE, 7.9% Operating. 3.9% Health Center ASI, 1.2% & CAPS, 1.7% IRA, 20% Parking, 1.2% Extended Ed, 4.0% - General Fund 52.19 Housing. 16.0% 3 UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU Grants & Contracts. 4.2% Capital Budget 2.1% "Only General Fund is state-funded; all other areas generate own revenue. looming budget obstacles and funding challenges. Broader programming could expand the audience, but might also dilute the connection regular patrons felt with the center. The underlying consensus was that a potential donor would not give unless he or she felt a personal con- nection to the cause. By this understanding the larg- est pool of potential donors would be the patrons who engaged with the Green Music Center by attending performances. There were challenges to fundraising that were present at all similar institutions, and some that were specific to the Green Music Center. Performing arts centers on college campuses tended to face an iden- tity crisis since they were set amongst a younger di th. Will the damn Programming and Engagement The most efficient way to engage a potential donor or a member of the community was through program- ming. Per Senior Director for Development Steven Berry, the more performances patrons attended, the befalt to the Lord te bereit M Assingment - annur.s.pasha@ X Binder3.pdf E BMGT 304 Major Project - Goox C Financial Statement Analysis: X M Assingment - annur.s.pasha@ + C 0 File /Users/annurpasha/Downloads/Binder3.pdf : Binder3.pdf 5 / 5 100% + EXHIBIT 7 The Green Music Center as a Percentage of the Sonoma State University Budget* 2 Foundation GF 0.1% Green Music Center, 3.5% Campus Life SSE, 7.9% Operating. 3.9% Health Center ASI, 1.2% & CAPS, 1.7% IRA, 20% Parking, 1.2% Extended Ed, 4.0% - General Fund 52.19 Housing. 16.0% 3 UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU Grants & Contracts. 4.2% Capital Budget 2.1% "Only General Fund is state-funded; all other areas generate own revenue. looming budget obstacles and funding challenges. Broader programming could expand the audience, but might also dilute the connection regular patrons felt with the center. The underlying consensus was that a potential donor would not give unless he or she felt a personal con- nection to the cause. By this understanding the larg- est pool of potential donors would be the patrons who engaged with the Green Music Center by attending performances. There were challenges to fundraising that were present at all similar institutions, and some that were specific to the Green Music Center. Performing arts centers on college campuses tended to face an iden- tity crisis since they were set amongst a younger di th. Will the damn Programming and Engagement The most efficient way to engage a potential donor or a member of the community was through program- ming. Per Senior Director for Development Steven Berry, the more performances patrons attended, the befalt to the Lord te bereit