Find and discuss a case that includes: The Insanity Defense and/or the Competency to Stand Trial. Briefly provide a background for the case, the legal ruling, as well as how the Insanity Defense and/or Competency to Stand Trial were applied. Considering that the legal system is founded upon precedence and can be quite arbitrary, do you believe that these defenses were used ethically, meaning it was provided to someone who actually suffered from a mental illness or incompetence, or as a means to ameliorate a guilty parties' dubious defense?

Reference: https://verdugopsych.com/not-guilty-by-reason-of-insanity-vs-incompetent-to-stand-trial-whats-the-difference-between-them/