First, read the case included in this module: 'Til Death Do My Part

Then, follow the sample format provided in this module, and submit your assignment to this Dropbox using full APA $7$th edition formatting.

Complete this assignment, as follows:

Identification

First, list $5$ secondary ethical issues you see in the case. These are the issues that undergird the main moral issue, but are not the central ethical issue themselves. Think of these as the things that build up to the main issue. Present these issues in the form of an $"$is it right" question. Ex$.$ Is it right to take something that is not yours?

Then, list the central ethical issue as follows:

$($one sentence in bold print$)$

State the central ethical$/$main moral issue in question format: Should Bob...? What should Bob...?

Remember: the main moral issue should be the biggest question the decision maker would need to answer about the case. Also, it needs to be either a "Should question" that could be answered with a "yes" or $"$no$"$ or a "What should" question that the four options would attempt to answer.

Be impartial $--$ do not show a bias in the way your question is written. This means that the question should not read as if you have already made up your mind about what is to be done. At this point, each answer and option should have a "fair shot" so to speak.

Write just one issue, not two; so$,$ do not use the word $"$or$."$

Research $($numbered list$)$

List three topics that would be appropriate to research regarding this case and what you identified as the main ethical issue. Suppose you were the person named in the main ethical issue, and you had to make a decision about the main ethical issue, what facts would you want to discover to help you make a better decision, and where would you find it$?$ You do not need to actually complete the research; just list the three specific topics the decision$-$maker should research and discuss, in $3-4$ sentences for each, why these topics were chosen. What would the decision maker hope to discover? How would they help the decision maker come to a final decision. Three distinctly different topics are required.

Analysis $($chart$)$

Complete the analysis chart to include:

At least four options the decision maker could take and all the stakeholders you have identified from the case. Be sure to consider everyone who could be affected by the decision maker's actions.

Stakeholders are people or a business$/$entity that represents people. A stakeholder cannot be a thing such as a friendship or a reputation. Some stakeholders will be individuals, and others may be logically connected groups of people who would share an outcome. Please consider these groups carefully.

All options must be in the control of the central person $($decision maker$)$ named in the main ethical issue. For example, if the issue is Should Jack report, Jill? The first option could be $-$Jack could report Jill's stealing to the boss. There are probably many more than $4$ options but choose the $4$ best options. All options should be reasonable ones that the person named in the main ethical issue could choose to make their decision. For example, you could NOT use, Jill could turn herself into the boss because Jill is not the central person named in the main ethical issue. Also, choose the best options that could resolve the ethical issue.

Once you have four options and all the stakeholders filled in$,$ complete the chart with possible consequences; briefly explain how you believe each stakeholder may be affected by each option. For example, for the option $-$ Jack could report Jill, a possible consequence for Jack, as one of the stakeholders, is that Jack could become a victim of Jill's scorn. For Jill, as one of the stakeholders, a possible consequence is that Jill could lose her job.