Focusing on pause duration (PD) provide the appropriate p-value for:

Is there evidence of a Feeding Method effect?

Is there evidence of a Time (early vs. Late) effect?

Is there evidence of a Feeding Method Time interaction?

included in the analysis due Consequently, 14 breast-feeding sessions and 15 bottle-feeding sessi yielding a total of 539 sucking bursts for the 29 tracings. From these sucking bursts, 343 burst further quantitative analysis using the previously described criteria; 83 from BrF1, 89 from Br 89 from BoF2. When the data were aggregated, 13 within-infant comparisons of breast-feedin sessions at comparable gestational age were obtained. A summary of the statistical analysis o described in Table 2. Factors BrFT DOFT Bof Feeding Memad Time waction BO (sec) A1.121 = 1.60 R1.121 = 7.84 .016 At, 121 = .30 PD (sock 11.4 A1.311 =5.49 A1.11) =6.73 025 R1.17) = 2.56 SA (per sec) 1,1 1.1 12 A1.121 = 56 463 A1,121 = 2.48 143 R1 121 = 1.23 267 RAB (per min) 53.5 53.6 40.8 47.9 R1.121 = 4.53 .065 R1.12) = 1.75 RT.121 = 2.29 .156 RAP (per min) 58.9 41.11) = 2.37 1.11) - 2.37 .124 21.11) = 1.32 275 ED - burst duration, PD = pause duration; SA = sucking rates: ARB - respiratory rates during bursts, RAP = respiratory rates during pauses between bursts; BrF1 = early in breaseeding sessions; Off2 = late in breasteding seasions; Sof1 = early in bottle feeding sessions. BoF2 = late in bable sessions. TABLE 2. Paired Comparisons Using Aggregated Means Early and Late in Breast and Bottle Fee Duration of Bursts and Pauses: BD was longer for BoF1 and BoF2 than for BrF1 and BrF2, decreased late in feeding sessions when compared to BD early in feeding sessions for both b bottle-feeding. This decrease in BD late in feeding sessions was statistically significant (p = . BD and PD early and late in feeding sessions are depicted in Figure 1. PD was longer late in f both feeding methods. This increase was greater during breast-feeding sessions when compa