For each construct a short essay in which you:

Explore how the work treats the theme of innocence and experience. Make an argument about what you think the work challenges the reader to consider. Think of this as your "what". "What do you think?" $(5$ points per essay$)$

Support your argument by referring to at least $2$ literary devices from the lecture notes listed below to discuss how the text works. Explain these terms in your own words and then discuss how these choices enhance what the work leads the reader to consider $($part A$).$ Here is a list of possible concepts, do not use the same one more than once throughout the $4$ short essays $(3$ points each$-6$ per essay$)$

Diction

Defamiliarization

Aesthetics

Narrative arrangement

Plot $($exposition$/$climax$/$resolution$)$

Unreliable narrator

Voice

Focalization $($point of view$)$

Irony

Tone

Symbol

Textual level$/$authorial level

Reader inference $($response$)$

Illustrate the use of each device by using a specific quote from the work for each device. $($See below for how to incorporate quotes$).$ These quotes should Display what you have already said by showing an example. Think of this as your "Where?" $(5$ Points each $10$ per essay$)$

Conclude by stating why the overall point you have explored is significant. In other words $"$So what?" $(4$ points per essay$)$