For each of the relations below, specify in which normal from they are. Give a detailed explanation as to why including any functional dependencies necessary to prove $91)$ they are in a given form and $(2)$ they are not in the next form. That is$,$ functional dependencies are not required to prove in$/$not in $0$NF and in$/$not in $1$NF$,$ but they are for in$/$not in $2$NF and in$/$not in $3$NF$.$ Also,, if the sample data sugges an attribute is a determinant, then it is; you do not need to prove it logically$.$