For number 5: The result from the preceeding question was (100101110) base 2.

5 3 points) Re-write the result obtained in the preceding question (decimal unsigned whole number 302 in binary) in hex. 6 (3 points) Using the repeated division method, represent the decimal unsigned whole mumber 382 in base-5 CAUTION You will earn NO CREDITS if you simply show the final result and not clearly show working (i.e., intermediate steps) ( points) Using Horner's scheme, represent (evaluate) the 2's complement number 100101110 in decimal. CAUTION: You will earn NO CREDITS if you don't use Honer's scheme to more efficiently evaluate polynomial. You MUST apply Horner's scheme direculy on the polynomial expansion for the number as given NOT on the polynomial expansion for the 2's complement of the given number) (This means that you should NOT. for instance, evaluate 1011 as corresponding positive value of 1011 using Horner's scheme>) (It also means that you should NOT, for instance, evaluate 1011 as cunsigned value of 1e11 using Horner's schemes - 24) You MUST apply Horner's scheme to cover all contributing bits, i.e, all contributing bits (not just the non-zero contributing bits, for instance) must participate in the repeated factoring. You will earn NO CREDITS if you simply show the final result and not clearly show working (i.e., intermediate steps). 8 (8 points) Represent (in binary and separately) the decimal signed whole numbers 302 and-302 in each of the following formats (a) sign-magnitude. (b) 1's complement (c) 2's complement (d) excess-511 For Parts (a). (b) and (c). use the minimum number of bits necessary, for Part (d), use the same mumber of bits as in Parts (a), b) and (c). CAUTION You will ea NO CREDITS if you simply show the final result and not clearly show working (i.e, intermediate steps) (If you use the result from a previous question, indicate the question number and intermediate steps already shown to arrive at that result can be skipped)