for same question: Part c) You would take the alternative hypothesis to be: one-sided, right-tailed. two-sided. one-sided, left-tailed. It does not matter whether we take a one-sided or two-sided alternative. Part d) Suppose that, based on data collected, you reject the null hypothesis. Which of the following could you conclude? There is sufficient evidence to suggest that the mean depth of Northern Hemisphere icebergs has increased due to global warming. There is sufficient evidence to suggest that the mean depth of Northern Hemisphere icebergs has not changed. There is sufficient evidence to suggest that the mean depth of Northern Hemisphere icebergs has decreased due to global warming. There is insufficient evidence to suggest that the mean depth of Northern Hemisphere icebergs has not changed. There is insufficient evidence to suggest that the mean depth of Northern Hemisphere icebergs has increased due to global warming. There is insufficient evidence to suggest that the mean depth of Northern Hemisphere icebergs has decreased due to global warming. Part e) Suppose that, based on data collected, you decide that the mean depth of Northern Hemisphere icebergs has increased due to global warming. It is possible that you are making a Type I error. It is possible that you are making a Type II error. It is certainly correct that the mean depth of Northern Hemisphere icebergs has increased due to global warming. It is certainly incorrect that the mean depth of Northern Hemis