for the prudential UK case study :

Making sense by analyzing the problem and pitfalls

The frame work if it applies

What type of change the organization went through is it fundamental planned change is it contingent change $($ look into the applicable theories $)$

Was it unplanned $?$

If it was planned is it more likely they planned the strategic plan to do this change, if it was un planned that means they applied more of a dynamic or emergent strategy for change

How was the leadership presented in the case was it classic, $($ evolution theories $)$

Or was it moving past the hero type of leadership, how did it effect the change implementation.

How was the HRM practices implemented Hard Vs Soft? Or what type of HRM was applicable in this case, how did it effect the change application.

Finally what would you do differently for each part?